The issue with 96k is it’s not providing any extra useful information and can even cause problems because of high frequency harmonics (>20kHz). If you want to slow down an audio file, you might suggest that you would benefit from having more samples in between (for example if you recorded something at 96kHz you would be able to slow it down to 50% speed without having to use software to interpolate the extra bits). The problem is, anything that was captured because of high sample rates is stuff you wouldn’t otherwise hear (and probably don’t want to). Those high harmonics are not musically realated to any of the natural frequencies.

how about $400? That’s street price…

I thought Nagra had that distinction.

…because you get what you pay for, Florian. ;)

Thanks for these tips, i will try to apply them as much as possible.
I realized that 24 v phantom give me more of operation time, but the pity part is i use Rode NTG3
and this one operate only with 48v (works with P24, but there is significant drop on heights and some kind of distortion present). Stamina is not really option, 16/44.1 sets significant limits on the postproduction. However, even with MKH 416 on P24 and stamina mode i did not get more then 1,5 h. battery life (only one phantom powered mic.) And more interesting thing, anybody else experienced – if you use setup Boom + lav mic, both connected via XLR, the battery is wasted much faster? When i connected lav receiver via jack the problem was solved. Most probably h4n has no intelligence to realize when the phantom source is really needed – in this case it could be rally nice to setup every input separately ….
I cannot imagine how this new (quite promising ) zoom device can handle 6 phantom powered inputs .
Noise level is problem with my NTG4 Rode mic, which is nice quiet mic for ambients recording.
Actually, any gain higher then 80 – 85 cause always notable preamp noise.
Still, Zoom h4n is amazing device for that money. But i found these limitations really annoying,
i wish i have bigger budget for a little bit better device – or at least for the proper field mixer :)

I don’t have a problem with the noise floor on the H4n – it’s no different to the other handhelds (with the exception of the D50 and M10), but the Rolands Tascams Olympius are all using the same “logic” preamps – try good mics with it, if you use NTG2 or the like sure you’re going to get some hiss.
Phantom power not an issue with me don’t use P48 use P24 in the H4n – lasts awhile 3-4 hours and maybe go “Stamina” I realise this setting records at 16/44,1 but on a recorder like this no biggie not using 24/48.

I agree though they should have improved on the H4n – maybe with true line input, faster boot time when you turn it on, can’t think of anything else as I think the build quality is great and the rubber does a great job of minimise handling noise, the lack of a roll cage over the XY never bothered me as I don’t drop things this size.

I think the H6 was developed awhile ago probably when the Roland R26 turd came out, we all know that flopped and is horrible.

I predict unlike the other HIT handy recorders this will FLOP big time, I mean we have or will aquire mics these built in ones look pathetic, this looks really toy warehouse.

I thought Zoom was going to keep owning the low end in recorders but now I think they’ll have some serious competition when BlackMagic Design releases there rumored B.M.A.R.