Comments on: Pro Tools 10 at AES – Part 2 https://designingsound.org/2011/10/22/pro-tools-1-at-aes-part-2/ Art and technique of sound design Wed, 06 Jul 2016 17:09:50 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.2.8 By: Zack https://designingsound.org/2011/10/22/pro-tools-1-at-aes-part-2/#comment-3004 Sun, 23 Oct 2011 18:46:34 +0000 https://designingsound.org/?p=11401#comment-3004 Does it include mp3 export options right out of the box yet?

]]> By: A Few Facts About the New Pro Tools 10 » Dynamic Interference Blog https://designingsound.org/2011/10/22/pro-tools-1-at-aes-part-2/#comment-3003 Sun, 23 Oct 2011 04:26:51 +0000 https://designingsound.org/?p=11401#comment-3003 […] Update: The previous generation hardware (Accel and blue face plate I/O) will function better with Pro Tools 10 than they do with Pro Tools 9 or earlier. They will not however, come close to the power of the new hardware. However, you will not get all of the benefits of the new software with this hardware (i.e. increased delay compensation, voice count, etc….see comments here). […]

]]> By: charles maynes https://designingsound.org/2011/10/22/pro-tools-1-at-aes-part-2/#comment-3002 Sun, 23 Oct 2011 01:51:45 +0000 https://designingsound.org/?p=11401#comment-3002 Matt, that is due to the limitations of the dsp’s on the Accel cards more than anything else. 

]]> By: Matt https://designingsound.org/2011/10/22/pro-tools-1-at-aes-part-2/#comment-3001 Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:55:45 +0000 https://designingsound.org/?p=11401#comment-3001 The main features that many were hoping for for TDM systems do NOT work in PT10HD, as confirmed in Avid’s PDF. 

No increased voice count. 
No increased delay compensation. 
No improved mix engine. 

]]> By: Shaun Farley https://designingsound.org/2011/10/22/pro-tools-1-at-aes-part-2/#comment-3000 Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:26:15 +0000 https://designingsound.org/?p=11401#comment-3000 In reply to Roman.

corrections are welcome. i definitely could have mis-heard the file bit/sample rate conversion specifics when i as speaking to the rep. as for Clip Gain, i was told there is no difference. the rep didn’t mention anything about coalescing, though. so, i’ll confirm the two points today…as well as add a few more details that have come up since posting this last night. thanks for feedback and corrections.

]]> By: Roman https://designingsound.org/2011/10/22/pro-tools-1-at-aes-part-2/#comment-2999 Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:03:17 +0000 https://designingsound.org/?p=11401#comment-2999 Hi Shaun,
I hate to correct you, but unfortunately there appears to be a difference in the Clip Based Gain functionality between PT 10 and PT 10HD (or CPTK): The later version let’s you coalesce and convert clip gain settings to track-based volume automation and vice versa.
Also not sure about the mixed bit depths, as PDF says this on the “Save Session Copy” dialog: “Sessions with mixed file formats and bit- depths must convert all files to the same file format and bit depth.”
See page 14 and 29 of the “What’s new in Pro Tools 10” PDF: http://tinyurl.com/3mutv9j

]]> By: raal https://designingsound.org/2011/10/22/pro-tools-1-at-aes-part-2/#comment-2998 Sat, 22 Oct 2011 06:16:38 +0000 https://designingsound.org/?p=11401#comment-2998 have heard so much speculation that it’s hard to separate ‘real’ from ‘imagined’. i’m pretty sure that even avid isn’t quite certain as to how this will all play out. if waves doesn’t ‘comply’ soon, it might put a wrench in avid’s plans. will go to the avid booth tomorrow and see if i can get some specific info. thanks shaun for the clear explanation.

]]>