Comments on: Pro Tools 10 at AES https://designingsound.org/2011/10/20/pro-tools-10-at-aes/ Art and technique of sound design Wed, 06 Jul 2016 17:09:50 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.2.8 By: Jamie Hardt https://designingsound.org/2011/10/20/pro-tools-10-at-aes/#comment-2997 Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:59:21 +0000 https://designingsound.org/?p=11383#comment-2997 “The funny thing is, that programs like REAPER allow for free item-positioning in track lanes to allow for sophisticated arranging that can’t be done in programs like Pro Tools 10. ”

This is something Reaper does very well, and it’s clip-based processing is really extraordinary, unfortunately Reaper’s implementation of 5.1 is only a little better than Pro Tools 4.2.  I’ve had the idea of doing a write-up on it for a while but I’ve been waiting until they support surround sound properly.

]]> By: Joseph Willett https://designingsound.org/2011/10/20/pro-tools-10-at-aes/#comment-2996 Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:16:45 +0000 https://designingsound.org/?p=11383#comment-2996 The funny thing is, that programs like REAPER allow for free item-positioning in track lanes to allow for sophisticated arranging that can’t be done in programs like Pro Tools 10. Say for instance, you want 12 regions to share one track lane. Drag and arrange, and voila! Each item can still be processed and edited individually, and you can freeze it when you’re done.

]]> By: Atanas Tcholakov https://designingsound.org/2011/10/20/pro-tools-10-at-aes/#comment-2995 Sun, 23 Oct 2011 13:21:49 +0000 https://designingsound.org/?p=11383#comment-2995 “(BTW, features we’re still waiting for: … audiosuite history … )”

I think this sounds good:

ProTools® ReferenceGuideVersion 10.0 -Undoing AudioSuite Processing
If you have processed an audio selection nonde- structively, the Undo and Redo commands let you undo the selected AudioSuite process. You can undo or redo an AudioSuite process during audio playback.

]]> By: David https://designingsound.org/2011/10/20/pro-tools-10-at-aes/#comment-2994 Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:11:15 +0000 https://designingsound.org/?p=11383#comment-2994 Nice article. I agree with your assessment of what is missing. 

This upgrade would probably be worth that price if Digi had not already gouged us less than a year ago for the “upgrade” to PT 9, which was not an upgrade so much as paying to lost the hardware dongle (a side-grade at best). I’m not sure why this was not done at the same time as these upgrades. For those of us working on smaller salaries (academics), this is not an affordable upgrade. 

]]> By: A Few Facts About the New Pro Tools 10 » Dynamic Interference Blog https://designingsound.org/2011/10/20/pro-tools-10-at-aes/#comment-2993 Sat, 22 Oct 2011 05:30:14 +0000 https://designingsound.org/?p=11383#comment-2993 […] is a follow up post to Jamie’s article from last night. I spent some time at the Avid booth today to get answers to questions I developed […]

]]> By: Jamie Hardt https://designingsound.org/2011/10/20/pro-tools-10-at-aes/#comment-2992 Fri, 21 Oct 2011 19:04:03 +0000 https://designingsound.org/?p=11383#comment-2992 They have 64 bit on the busses, the question is if it will be supported on the old hardware. 

]]> By: Tristan Horton https://designingsound.org/2011/10/20/pro-tools-10-at-aes/#comment-2991 Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:15:50 +0000 https://designingsound.org/?p=11383#comment-2991 Thanks for the Summary.
Talk of missing features:
64bit (surprised face, sad face)
The final hurdle to “Native Bliss”
can’t be too far away now, maybe that’s what the Mayans were on about in 2012!

]]>